Grinders · 3 differences · 5 published for only one
Q2 S vs Baby Grinder
Shown at the same height, not to scale: Q2 S does not publish a height.
Image: Eureka (Conti Valerio), the manufacturers' product photographs. About our images
Specification
| Field | Q2 S | Baby Grinder |
|---|---|---|
| Burr geometry | Conical | Conical |
| Burr diameter | not published | 48mm |
| Burr material | Steel | not published |
| Grind range | Filter | All-purpose |
| Type | Hand | Hand |
| Dosing | Manual | Manual |
| Single dosing | Yes | Yes |
| Hopper | 20g | 40g |
| Adjustment | Stepped | Stepped |
| Width | not published | 200mm |
| Depth | not published | 56mm |
| Height | not published | 80mm |
| Weight | 0.47kg | 0.76kg |
A lit cell is the better value only where nobody would argue (more capacity, less retention, a lower list price, a feature present) and only when both makers publish the figure. "Not published" is never counted as a loss.