Grinders · 3 differences · 4 published for only one
JX vs Chestnut C3s
Shown at the same height, not to scale: JX and Chestnut C3s do not publish a height.
Images: 1Zpresso, Timemore, the manufacturers' product photographs. About our images
Specification
| Field | JX | Chestnut C3s |
|---|---|---|
| Burr geometry | Conical | not published |
| Burr diameter | 48mm | 38mm |
| Burr material | not published | Steel |
| Grind range | Filter | All-purpose |
| Type | Hand | Hand |
| Dosing | Manual | Manual |
| Single dosing | Yes | Yes |
| Hopper | 35g | 30g |
| Adjustment | Stepped | Stepped |
| Steps | not published | 90 |
| Weight | 0.65kg | not published |
A lit cell is the better value only where nobody would argue (more capacity, less retention, a lower list price, a feature present) and only when both makers publish the figure. "Not published" is never counted as a loss.