Espresso machines · 9 differences · 4 published for only one
Core 600 1 Group vs Eagle Tempo Neo 2 Group
Astoria and Victoria Arduino, side by side at one scale on a 60 cm counter.
Images: Astoria (CMA), Victoria Arduino, the manufacturers' product photographs, scaled by each published height. About our images
Specification
| Field | Core 600 1 Group | Eagle Tempo Neo 2 Group |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 580mm | 825mm |
| Depth | 580mm | 650mm |
| Height | 557mm | 416mm |
| Weight | 62.5kg | 62kg |
| Boiler volume | 6L | 8L |
| Boiler material | not published | Stainless |
| Groups | 1 | 2 |
| Steam wand | Commercial | Commercial |
| Milk system | Manual wand | Manual wand |
| Voltage | 120 / 230 / 240 / 400V | not published |
| Power | 3,300W | 7,400W |
| Heating element | 3.3kW | 7.4kW |
| Phase | Single or three | not published |
| Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Display | Touchscreen | LCD |
| Built-in grinder | No | No |
| Colours | Steel, White, Red | not published |
A lit cell is the better value only where nobody would argue (more capacity, less retention, a lower list price, a feature present) and only when both makers publish the figure. "Not published" is never counted as a loss.